| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Package naming conventions |
| Date: | 2003-08-08 15:40:36 |
| Message-ID: | 3F33C474.7030506@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
>>Sent: 08 August 2003 14:53
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>>
>>
>>
>>I Totally agree with Dave. But don't you think we could go
>>further ? As
>>you just renamed files, the informations concerning the packages are
>>still what they were when it was released :
>>for example :
>>
>>
>
>Urgh. didn't realise that info was in the RPMs. It's not in the Win32 or Slackware releases.
>
We can have verbose version information in win32 using VERSION
resources. This would be win32-best-practice. I'll have a look at it.
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-08 15:49:30 | Re: pgAdmin3 help system |
| Previous Message | Raphaël Enrici | 2003-08-08 15:21:30 | Re: Package naming conventions |