| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tom dyson <tom(at)torchbox(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neal Todd <neal(at)torchbox(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: optimum postgres server configuration |
| Date: | 2003-08-05 22:28:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3F302F93.3030704@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> * Disk speed
4 drives... 7200 RPM... as big as you can get. Get 8 Meg cache drives so
you have a 3 year warranty.
> * Hardware RAID
3Ware IDE controller (or SATA) running RAID 10
> * Memory
2 gig
> * Processor speed
1800+
> * Processor type
Athlon MP
> * Multiple processors
>
2
We are able to run a 60 person insurance company entirely off of the box
I described above with ZERO load problems.
> And does the list have any observations regarding Postgres performance on
> different platforms? Our webservers run Linux (RedHat 8), but we're willing
> to experiment with alternatives.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Tom
>
> -----------------+
> tom dyson
> t: +44 (0)1608 811870
> m: +44 (0)7958 752657
> http://torchbox.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-05 22:46:47 | Re: indices and cidr/inet type |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-05 22:24:35 | Re: INSERT RULE QUERY ORDER |