Re: like performance w/o wildcards.

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> writes:
>
>>>The index is for non-LIKE comparisons, like = and >.
>>>
>>
>>My point is what is the difference? If the index is done char by char then LIKE ought to
>>be able to use the index to find 'F*', no matter what the locale is. What can't you
>>figure out what is before/after a given char? Don't you have that information? Don't you
>>need it to create the index in the first place?
>
>
> <yawn> Read the archives. We would love to use locale-sorted indexes
> for LIKE, but we *can't*. There are too many bizarre sorting rules.
> (Hint: almost no locale does its sorting purely "char by char".)
>
> regards, tom lane

What percentage of locales have this problem? Does latin1 have this problem?

And what about my original idea, can LIKE be turned into an = when there are no wildcards?