From: | Gogulus <gogulus(at)eqnet(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Basic questions before start |
Date: | 2003-07-30 20:57:06 |
Message-ID: | 3F283122.7030104@eqnet.hu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
scott.marlowe wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Gogulus wrote:
>
>
>
>>As the clients should be able to work without network connection, they
>>have to have a local database, and if net connection is on, do the
>>synchronization with master db. The main idea is, sale cannot stop
>>because of net connection breakage.
>>
>>That's why I am asking if 100 Mhz of CPU, 32 Mbytes of RAM can take care
>>of a database with around 100 tables, 3-4 of these tables having
>>50-60000 of records, others have at most 1000.
>>
>>
>
>I would say yes, but I would also say that you should design this around a
>character based interface. The overhead of a GUI is gonna make it much
>slower.
>
>I don't know if you're familiar with the ncurses library, but that's what
>I'd use, along with C or a lightweight scripting language like Perl or
>PHP.
>
>
Well, the whole application is written in C or C++ after redesign. It
has to be, because the PC needs to cooperate with a special driver
handling special hardwares connected to the PC. The GUI is already
implemented using SVGALib and MicroWin. So I wanna say, not only PGSQL
will run on it... And it is all on Red Hat 7.1 because of driver limitation.
Gogulus
>
>.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nailah Ogeer | 2003-07-30 21:03:57 | File Cache |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-07-30 20:42:17 | Re: Minimal system (was Re: Basic questions before start) |