From: | Ron <rstpierre(at)syscor(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2003-07-30 18:59:42 |
Message-ID: | 3F28159E.6090606@syscor.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>Robert,
>
>
>
>>Are you planning on differentiating between dedicated machines and
>>
>>
>multi-server
>
>
>>machines? For example, a dedicated database for a webserver would be tuned
>>differently from a server that was running both the webserver and the
>>
>>
>database on
>
>
>>the same machine.
>>
>>
>
>My thought is when we define "Small Machine" in at the top of the file we
>define it as "Small Machine or Multi-Purpose machine". The settings should
>be nearly the same for a machine that has only 64MB of *available* RAM as one
>that has only 96MB of RAM at all.
>
>
>
We are using postgres 7.3.2 for one of our clients with a smallish db,
on a p4 with 4G ram box which also servers as a web server and a
web-based file repository (~ 80G). We are starting another project for
another customer, on a p4 with 2G ram, and the db will be larger, approx
7-15G when finished. This box will also be used as a web server, and as
it won't go 'live' until the fall, will run 7.4.
I don't know if this is representative of other postgresql installs, but
I would also put in my vote for the differentiation added, as these are
not small machines but are multi-server boxes.
my 2 cents worth
Ron
PS the new postgresql.conf performance tuning docs are extremely
helpful, thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-30 19:10:49 | Re: postgresql.conf |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-30 18:43:11 | Re: postgresql.conf |