From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hardware performance and some more |
Date: | 2003-07-25 13:59:08 |
Message-ID: | 3F218504.3163.25E942@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 25 Jul 2003 at 16:38, Kasim Oztoprak wrote:
> this is kind of directory assistance application. actually the select statements are not
> very complex. the database contain 25 million subscriber records and the operators searches
> for the subscriber numbers or addresses. there are not much update operations actually the
> update ratio is approximately %0.1 .
>
> i will use at least 4 machines each having 4 cpu with the speed of 2.8 ghz xeon processors.
> and suitable memory capacity with it.
Are you going to duplicate the data?
If you are going to have 3000 sql statements per second, I would suggest,
1. Get quad CPU. You probably need that horsepower
2. Use prepared statements and stored procedures to avoid parsing overhead.
I doubt you would need cluster of machines though. If you run it thr. a pilot
program, that would give you an idea whether or not you need a cluster..
Bye
Shridhar
--
Default, n.: The hardware's, of course.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-07-25 14:03:26 | Re: hardware performance and some more |
Previous Message | Andrew McMillan | 2003-07-25 10:45:38 | Re: Tuning PostgreSQL |