From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Nailah Ogeer <ogeer(at)cs(dot)queensu(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Checkpoints |
Date: | 2003-07-22 18:55:45 |
Message-ID: | 3F1D88B1.7050708@cvc.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
I mean, what is getting buffered? What performance effects is it supposed allow?
Nailah Ogeer wrote:
> Hello,
> I have written code to support multiple buffer pools in postgres 7.3.2.
> Now i am looking at changing the sizes of these buffer pools, but first i
> need to write all pages to disk.
> I also need to incorporate this code into the backend instead of it being
> a sql statement as it is now. I noticed that at a checkpoint, dirty pages
> are written to disk. I was just wondering if someone can tell me how
> postgres handles checkpoints and if it is advisable to do the sizing right
> after a checkpoint?
>
> Nailah
> MSc Student
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-07-22 18:56:17 | Re: New Poll @ Codewalkers |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-07-22 18:55:22 | Re: Checkpoints |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-07-22 19:05:46 | Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg? |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-07-22 18:55:22 | Re: Checkpoints |