Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
Date: 2003-07-21 10:17:30
Message-ID: 3F1C0B12.12261.149ABDEC@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 21 Jul 2003 at 11:58, Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> My personal goal is to see the difference in features, how the lack of
> features can be worked around in the application (in both databases) and if
> missing features are on the PostgreSQL todo list and in what time frame.

I suggest you look at release notes of couple fo releases back as well. That
will give you an idea how it is moving.

> In the ideal case I would combine all this into a white paper.

That would be a great addition to community resources.


> As I said again - this is an intellectual survey and has nothing to do with
> being satisfied or not with PostgreSQL. Currently we have no problems with
> PostgreSQL.

Glad to hear that.

> Thanks for your comments. I copied your e-mail in the wiki. I hope you do
> not mind.

no I don't..:-)

Bye
Shridhar

--
A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her. --
McCoy, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.3

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-07-21 10:58:00 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle
Previous Message Iavor Raytchev 2003-07-21 09:58:54 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle