| From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle |
| Date: | 2003-07-21 10:17:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3F1C0B12.12261.149ABDEC@localhost |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 21 Jul 2003 at 11:58, Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> My personal goal is to see the difference in features, how the lack of
> features can be worked around in the application (in both databases) and if
> missing features are on the PostgreSQL todo list and in what time frame.
I suggest you look at release notes of couple fo releases back as well. That
will give you an idea how it is moving.
> In the ideal case I would combine all this into a white paper.
That would be a great addition to community resources.
> As I said again - this is an intellectual survey and has nothing to do with
> being satisfied or not with PostgreSQL. Currently we have no problems with
> PostgreSQL.
Glad to hear that.
> Thanks for your comments. I copied your e-mail in the wiki. I hope you do
> not mind.
no I don't..:-)
Bye
Shridhar
--
A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her. --
McCoy, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.3
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-07-21 10:58:00 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle |
| Previous Message | Iavor Raytchev | 2003-07-21 09:58:54 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle |