| From: | Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Kim Ho <kho(at)redhat(dot)com>, Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc-list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Prepared Statements |
| Date: | 2003-07-21 15:22:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3F1C0539.2050102@openratings.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
>
>
>Dima, you are talking about "functionality" which is not documented,
>discovered by yourself as working. This is similar with directly using
>the com.sun.* classes - might work now, but will be a major PITA when
>sun decides to change their internal API.
>
I know. I understood the risk when I took that approach. And I am not
complaining.
If you had good reasons to take that functionality away, I would not
mind at all.
In this case though, it just looks like you are going to take it out
"just because", and I think, it is a bad idea. That's all.
>You should have expected this
>outcome... and it's certainly not an argument against fixing the driver
>to be standards compliant...
>
>
>
What standard are you talking about?
Where does it say anything about the driver being *required* to provide
no way for people to specify a set as a parameter?
Or where does it even mention anything about the requirement to quote
every single parameter the user sends in?
If you can show me a standard, that *requires* either of the above (not
just is silent about it), I'll have to give up, and agree that I am wrong.
Dima
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2003-07-21 15:26:11 | Re: Prepared Statements |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2003-07-21 15:18:12 | Re: Prepared Statements |