Re: 2 connections 1 transaction

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2 connections 1 transaction
Date: 2003-07-17 14:52:39
Message-ID: 3F17058F.21911.FD352A@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 17 Jul 2003 at 16:47, Daniel Schuchardt wrote:
> 1.Client starts Transaction and does some changes.
> 2.Now the client notices that very huge operations are nescesarry and
> starts a procedure @ App-Server
> 3.App-Server reads the database and makes changes. Problem : the changes
> the client does are not commited -> the server can't see the changes or
> the case more bad the server waits for the client connection.
> (transaction isolation and table / record locking)
> 4.If everything works well both changes (done by the client and the
> server) should commit or rollback now

Why not route everything thr. app-server? If you have an app-server, then it
does not make sense exposing database directly to client.

Bye
Shridhar

--
> No manual is ever necessary.May I politely interject here: BULLSHIT. That's
the biggest Apple lie of all!(Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the
intuitiveness of interfaces.)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-07-17 14:53:06 Re: Strange behaviour of Postgresql (Postgresql 7.3.3
Previous Message Daniel Schuchardt 2003-07-17 14:47:01 Re: 2 connections 1 transaction