From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2 connections 1 transaction |
Date: | 2003-07-17 14:52:39 |
Message-ID: | 3F17058F.21911.FD352A@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 17 Jul 2003 at 16:47, Daniel Schuchardt wrote:
> 1.Client starts Transaction and does some changes.
> 2.Now the client notices that very huge operations are nescesarry and
> starts a procedure @ App-Server
> 3.App-Server reads the database and makes changes. Problem : the changes
> the client does are not commited -> the server can't see the changes or
> the case more bad the server waits for the client connection.
> (transaction isolation and table / record locking)
> 4.If everything works well both changes (done by the client and the
> server) should commit or rollback now
Why not route everything thr. app-server? If you have an app-server, then it
does not make sense exposing database directly to client.
Bye
Shridhar
--
> No manual is ever necessary.May I politely interject here: BULLSHIT. That's
the biggest Apple lie of all!(Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the
intuitiveness of interfaces.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-07-17 14:53:06 | Re: Strange behaviour of Postgresql (Postgresql 7.3.3 |
Previous Message | Daniel Schuchardt | 2003-07-17 14:47:01 | Re: 2 connections 1 transaction |