Re: index / sequential scan problem

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: index / sequential scan problem
Date: 2003-07-17 09:17:46
Message-ID: 3F16B712.19311.58D7530@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 17 Jul 2003 at 11:01, Fabian Kreitner wrote:
> psql (PostgreSQL) 7.2.2
>
> perg_1097=# VACUUM ANALYZE ;
> VACUUM
> perg_1097=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE select notiz_id, obj_id, obj_typ
> perg_1097-# from notiz_objekt a
> perg_1097-# where not exists
> perg_1097-# (
> perg_1097(# select 1
> perg_1097(# from notiz_gelesen b
> perg_1097(# where ma_id = 2001
> perg_1097(# and ma_pid = 1097
> perg_1097(# and a.notiz_id = b.notiz_id
> perg_1097(# )
> perg_1097-# ;

For 31K records, seq. scan does not sound like a bad plan to me but anyway..

How about

where ma_id = 2001::integer
and ma_pid = 1097::integer

in above query?

Bye
Shridhar

--
No one can guarantee the actions of another. -- Spock, "Day of the Dove",
stardate unknown

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Thomas 2003-07-17 10:12:48 Re: index / sequential scan problem
Previous Message Fabian Kreitner 2003-07-17 09:01:18 index / sequential scan problem