Re: warm and fuzzy

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: warm and fuzzy
Date: 2003-07-16 15:27:57
Message-ID: 3F15BC55.14860.1BA0180@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 16 Jul 2003 at 8:22, Joe Conway wrote:

> Robert Treat wrote:
> > <sigh>
> > It's kind of sad to see a quote like this from a source that you know
> > some people are looking toward for valid technical information. I'd love
> > to see the PostGIS guys write up an article about how one might go about
> > using geographic data for serious applications.
> >
>
> I'm not sure any of the PostGIS developers are on this list -- you may
> want to forward it to one of them.

Can we get a sign on page for major projects so that one person per project
could be lurking over postgresql advocacy? That way both the projects would
benenfit due to increased cross-talk.

Just extending this idea in general..

Bye
Shridhar

--
Burke's Postulates: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking
about. Don't create a problem for which you do not have the answer.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roderick A. Anderson 2003-07-17 00:42:20 Re: warm and fuzzy
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-07-16 15:22:03 Re: warm and fuzzy