Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Jörg Schulz <jschulz(at)sgbs(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and
Date: 2003-07-14 08:34:55
Message-ID: 3F126B2F.8050308@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jörg Schulz wrote:

>>... I have this feeling the reason Oracle gives this result may
>>be again because transactions have been switched off!
>
> This snippet comes from the Oracle console:
> (table name is "a" not "test" / messages are in german)
>
...

> SQL> select * from a;
>
> A
> ----------
> 1
> 3
> 4
> 2

Presumably Oracle is not rolling back a duplicate key violation,
allowing the transaction to continue. This is an often requested
feature not present in PostgreSQL.

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Childs 2003-07-14 08:43:46 Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and
Previous Message Jörg Schulz 2003-07-14 08:17:40 Re: different transaction handling between postgresql and oracle/mysql