| From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glen Huang <hey(dot)hgl(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to create unique index on multiple columns where the combination doesn't matter? |
| Date: | 2017-03-23 07:56:24 |
| Message-ID: | 3F1232AC-3AF5-47F5-A712-23C3D2B4B4FF@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:54, Glen Huang <hey(dot)hgl(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> If I have a table like
>
> CREATE TABLE relationship (
> obj1 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
> obj2 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
> obj3 INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES object,
> ...
> )
>
> And I want to constrain that if 1,2,3 is already in the table, rows like 1,3,2 or 2,1,3 shouldn't be allowed.
>
> Is there a general solution to this problem?
Does the order of the values of (obj1, obj2, obj3) in relationship matter? If not, you could swap them around on INSERT/UPDATE to be in sorted order. I'd probably go with a BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE trigger.
In addition, to prevent unsorted entry, on obj2 add CHECK (obj2 > obj1) and on obj3 add CHECK (obj3 > obj2).
Now you can create a normal PK or unique key on (obj1, obj2, obj3) as the order of their values is not variable anymore.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2017-03-23 09:11:59 | Re: Wiki editor privilege |
| Previous Message | Charles Clavadetscher | 2017-03-23 06:57:28 | Wiki editor privilege |