Re: Compile error in current cvs (~1230 CDT July 4)

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compile error in current cvs (~1230 CDT July 4)
Date: 2003-07-04 18:23:57
Message-ID: 3F05C63D.3050004@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>
>>Yeah, I've been getting that since Wednesday morning (west coast USA
>>time), and reported it Wednesday evening, but no one else has replied to
>>that post, so I thought maybe it was somehow related to the othee ecpg
>>issues being discussed.
>
>
> I've committed fixes for the problems noted by gcc. I wouldn't care to
> bet that the code actually works though. The HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP paths
> in ecpg seem to be totally untested :-(
>

Thanks, Tom. It does at least compile cleanly now. I don't use ecpg, so
I can't say whether the changes actually work.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-07-04 18:28:53 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 18:21:48 Re: Compile error in current cvs (~1230 CDT July 4)