From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |
Date: | 2003-06-29 20:04:42 |
Message-ID: | 3EFF465A.9060307@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> If I were you I'd file this on the to-fix-later list and concentrate
> on polymorphic aggregates during the next couple days. If that's not
> done by Tuesday it will be a tough sell to put in during beta.
Attached is a patch that implements polymorphic aggregates.
Included in the patch, I changed SQL language functions so that they
could be declared with and use polymorphic types. This was necessary to
facilitate my testing, and I had wanted to implement that all along
anyway (in fact I'd still like to allow PL/pgSQL to use polymorphic
types, but I'll try to do that separately).
The attached compiles cleanly and passes all regression tests. I've also
attached a test script and its output that I used to verify appropriate
behavior of CREATE AGGREGATE. The script attempts to cover all possible
combinations of inputs and outputs (wrt polymorphic vs non-polymorphic).
As far as I can see, the behaviors look correct.
Not sure if it makes sense to do so, but I could either add the test
script to an existing regression test, or create a new one with it if
desired.
If there are no objections, please apply.
Thanks,
Joe
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
array-polyagg.05.patch | text/plain | 35.1 KB |
array-polyagg-test.sql | text/plain | 13.3 KB |
array-polyagg-test.out | text/plain | 18.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PeterKorman | 2003-06-29 21:08:14 | Re: persistant psql feature suggestion |
Previous Message | Carlos Guzman Alvarez | 2003-06-29 19:34:33 | Question about array read using protocol 3.0 implementation in C# |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-29 21:24:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-06-29 17:42:46 | ruleutils with pretty-print option |