Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-22 12:07:10
Message-ID: 3EF59BEE.7040103@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I would not approve of a response along the lines of "can't you
> #ifdef to the point that there are no code changes in the Unix builds?"
> No you can't, unless you want to end up with an unmaintainable mess
> of #ifdef spaghetti. The thing that makes this hard is the tradeoff
> between making the code readable and maintainable (which requires
> sharing as much code as possible across platforms) vs isolating
> platform-specific considerations. Programming at this level is not
> a science but an art form, and it's very hard to get it right the first
> time --- especially when none of us have access to all the platforms
> that the code must ultimately work on.

Exactly my point and the reason I am doing the entire fork+exec stuff
over again. Bruce nagged me endlessly to commit the broken parts I had
and fix them later. I never agreed with that philosophy because in my
experience the worst workarounds live forever.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-06-22 12:39:26 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-22 11:44:27 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze