| From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | elein(at)varlena(dot)com |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erv Young <ervyoung(at)nc(dot)rr(dot)com>, "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: plpython? (Was: Re: Damn triggers and NEW) |
| Date: | 2003-06-19 23:25:23 |
| Message-ID: | 3EF24663.2030006@mascari.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
elein wrote:
> Thanks, Scott.
>
> I believe that was Kevin Jacobs in a message to pgsql-general
> and I've sent him a message about being available for testing.
It sure is a shame the Python folks just decided to punt instead of
rolling up their sleeves and fixing the problem. Now a cascade of
dependencies will be broken because of this. I've embedded Python in
applications myself and used the rexec module for "alleged"
protection. Imagine if the Java applet folks, having encountered
security problems in the past, just said, "this is too hard" and
bailed. Not good...
:-(
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Ellis | 2003-06-20 00:26:38 | Tuning question: WAL disk a bottleneck? |
| Previous Message | elein | 2003-06-19 23:12:17 | Re: plpython? (Was: Re: Damn triggers and NEW) |