Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump

From: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump
Date: 2003-06-18 15:57:41
Message-ID: 3EF08BF5.4070801@web.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:59:36PM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>
>
>>What I need again and again, is changing the size of a column (rarely
>>the type). For pgsql, I'd have to drop the column, and need to recreate
>>all views. For MSSQL, it won't matter if the column is dropped/recreated
>>or just resized, the view won't notice until it's used again.
>>
>>
>
>If that's what you need you can always change the system catalogs
>manually. For CHAR(n) and VARCHAR(n) you change pg_attribute.atttypmod
>to (n+4). For NUMERIC(n,m) it's something like (n<<16) + m + 4 or maybe
>(m<<16) + n + 4, don't remember right now.
>
>Be sure to check that your data is in a safe place before you do this,
>and double check before you commit the transaction if you do it
>manually.
>
>
>
Hm, you're right, 'thou I wouldn't recommend this to the average user,
and wonder if this will be possible for all future pgsql versions too.
I'm considering adding safe support for this type of column change to
pgAdmin3.
There might be other cases of legal direct change of system catalog
entries, e,g. varchar to text, if they all are only names for internally
identical data structures. Can you tell which datatypes may be legally
interchanged?

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2003-06-18 16:13:23 Re: information Windows - PostgreSQL
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-06-18 15:16:50 Re: lots of configure failures on freebsd/alpha