Re: How to make a IN without a table... ?

From: Christoph Haller <ch(at)rodos(dot)fzk(dot)de>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, dpradier(at)apartia(dot)fr
Subject: Re: How to make a IN without a table... ?
Date: 2003-06-12 11:16:27
Message-ID: 3EE8610A.EBE8B77@rodos.fzk.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

>
> i ran today in a problem when doing some (i mean too much for me)
advanced sql...
>
> What i want to do is something like this:
>
> SELECT
> my_var1,
> my_var2,
> my_function(my_var1, my_var2)
> FROM (
> SELECT
> '1',
> '2',
> '3',
> '4'
> ) AS my_var1_values,
> (
> SELECT
> '1',
> '2',
> '3',
> '4'
> ) AS my_var2_values
>
> In short, i want to calculate the result of the function my_function
for
> some values of my_var1, cross by some values of my_var2.
> These values are not taken in a table, but put in directly.
> They are a lot, so i would prefer not to write the whole thing, line
> after line. (Let's say 10 values for the first, and 40 for the second
=>
> 400 lines of code to maintain...)
>
> I really don't see how to do this :-/
>
What about using a TEMP TABLE?
And COPY <temp-table> FROM STDIN offers a real fast way to populate.
BTW, why using SQL at all? Couldn't perl do the job much easier?
Regards, Christoph

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marco Vezzoli 2003-06-12 11:21:01 multiple index search with postgres7.1.3 on solaris 8
Previous Message Cedar Cox 2003-06-12 10:20:54 subselects - which is faster?