Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms

From: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms
Date: 2003-06-05 15:39:09
Message-ID: 3EDF641D.3090808@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Does anyone know why apparently the 7.3beta1 version of the jdbc drivers
are what is included in the 7.3.3 rpms?

--Barry

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Official JDBC driver release ?
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:14:40 +0200
From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
References: <bbk5qo$bq4$1(at)main(dot)gmane(dot)org> <3EDE3083(dot)6070001(at)xythos(dot)com>

Barry Lind schrieb:
>> I'm a bit puzzled about the versions of the JDBC driver floating around.
>>
>> I initially downloaded the release for 7.3 from jdbc.postgresql.org
>>
>> Now I have seen that the JDBC driver which is included e.g. in the
>> RPM's for 7.3.3 is a bit older and has a different name
>> (pg73b1jdbc3.jar vs. pg73jdbc3.jar)
>
>
> The pg73b1jdbc3.jar file is very old (it is the 7.3 beta 1 version).
> What RPMs are you using? You should contact whoever produced those RPMs
> to get them built with the current version. The 'official' version is
> the source code that is tagged with the 7.3.3 freeze label (which is the
> version that is currently posted on the jdbc.postgresql.org web site)
>
> --Barry
Barry,

thanks for the answer.

The pg73b1jdbc3.jar file is contained in all the 7.3.3 rpm available on
the ftp mirrors... (ok, not necessarilly all, but I checked about 3 or 4
different mirrors)

I don't know who builds the rpms on the mirror sites available from
www.postgresql.org

Cheers
Thomas

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-05 15:44:21 Re: default locale considered harmful? (was Re: [GENERAL]
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-06-05 15:25:05 UPDATE ... SET = DEFAULT