| From: | Ben Lamb <pgsql-patches(at)zurgy(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase |
| Date: | 2003-05-28 19:26:17 |
| Message-ID: | 3ED50D59.8090506@zurgy.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Hi,
I sent a patch to this list earlier this month to improve the speed of
PGunescapeBytea(). IMHO it is handicapped as it can take over a minute
to process a large amount of data, e.g. a 500Kb JPEG.
The attached patch replaces the sscanf function that causes the delay,
the code was borrowed from the PostgreSQL Python interface with
permission from the author.
Please could I have some feedback on whether the patch is likely to be
committed? Has it been rejected? Is it stuck on someone's TODO list? Was
the code unsuitable? Have I neglected some procedure, etc?
Best regards,
Ben Lamb.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fe-exec.c.patch | text/plain | 3.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2003-05-28 20:30:39 | Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-28 18:36:45 | Re: [PATCHES] Sequence usage patch |