| From: | Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_namespace -> pg_schema? |
| Date: | 2003-04-29 22:19:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3EAEFA6D.6030304@web.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>
>
>>I know pg_namespace has been in release for one rev, but I was
>>wondering if for consistency sake there was any interest or desire or
>>plans to change the system catalog to pg_schema.
>>
>>
>
>No. The choice of catalog name was deliberate: a namespace is not
>necessarily identical to a schema. In any case, I can see no value
>to renaming it at this late date.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
I wonder if we should use the term NAMESPACE instead of SCHEMA in pgAdmin3.
Any suggestions?
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-04-30 08:11:15 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_namespace -> pg_schema? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-04-29 09:59:43 | Re: pgAdmin3 under MacOS X |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-29 22:21:15 | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-29 21:36:43 | "Adding missing from clause" |