Re: ODBC & Access [Try 2]

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
To: David Olbersen <DOlbersen(at)stbernard(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC & Access [Try 2]
Date: 2003-04-24 20:36:58
Message-ID: 3EA84AEA.40504@cvc.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You said it was the **ONE** table that had a text field for an index right?

David Olbersen wrote:
> Maybe, but I REALLY doubt it.
>
> Like I said, these other tables with very similar structures and very similar data display just fine. It's just this one.
>
> --------------------------
> David Olbersen
> iGuard Engineer
> 11415 West Bernardo Court
> San Diego, CA 92127
> 1-858-676-2277 x2152
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gearond(at)cvc(dot)net]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12:38 PM
>>To: David Olbersen
>>Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ODBC & Access [Try 2]
>>
>>
>>maybe it's related to sorting in your environment, the
>>client's environment, or the server's environment? Case
>>sensitive vs. not? (PS, I can't wait till UTF-8 gets totally
>>ubiquitous.)
>>
>>David Olbersen wrote:
>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Jeff Eckermann [mailto:jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com]
>>>>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12:08 PM
>>>>To: David Olbersen; pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>>Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ODBC & Access [Try 2]
>>>>
>>>><guess>
>>>>Make sure driver option "row versioning" is checked.
>>>>Also, make sure that the offending table has a primary
>>>>key that Access is recognizing as such.
>>>></guess>
>>>>If both of those conditions are met, and you still
>>>>have a problem, please post your driver settings.
>>>
>>>
>>>Turned on row versioning, no change.
>>>
>>>When I link the table, Access doesn't ask me to chose the
>>
>>primary key. When I look at the Design View for that table
>>it's chosen a primary key. The field it's chosen doesn't have
>>any NULL values and all the rows for that field are unique,
>>so it should be OK, right? The column that it chose is NOT a
>>numeric field, but text. Would that cause a problem?
>>
>>>Driver settings:
>>>================
>>>This is a System DSN.
>>>
>>>Datasource options (page 1)
>>> Disable Genetic Optimizer = Checked
>>> KSQO = Checked
>>> Recognize Unique Indexes = Checked
>>> Use Declare/Fetch = Checked
>>> CommLog = Checked
>>> Parse Statements = UNchecked
>>> Cancel as FreeStmt = UNchecked
>>> MyLog = Checked
>>> Unknown Sizes = Maximum
>>> Data Type Options:
>>> Text as LongVarChar = Checked
>>> Unknowns as LongVarChar = UNchecked
>>> Bools as Char = Checked
>>> Miscellanous:
>>> Max Varchar = 254
>>> Max LongVarChar = 8190
>>> Cache Size = 100
>>> SysTable Prefixes = dd_;
>>>
>>>Datasource options (page 2)
>>> Read Only = UNchecked
>>> Show System Tables = UNchecked
>>> LF <-> CR/LF conversion = Checked
>>> Updatable Cursors = Checked
>>> Row Versioning = Checked (now, wasn't before)
>>> Disallow Premature = UNchecked
>>> True is -1 = UNchecked
>>> Int8 as = default
>>> Protocol = 7.x,6.4+
>>> OID Options:
>>> Show Column = UNchecked
>>> Connect Settings = <blank>
>>>
>>>
>>>--------------------------
>>>David Olbersen
>>>iGuard Engineer
>>>11415 West Bernardo Court
>>>San Diego, CA 92127
>>>1-858-676-2277 x2152
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of
>>
>>broadcast)---------------------------
>>
>>>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
>>
>>majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-04-24 20:38:00 Re: pl-pgsql question
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-04-24 20:35:40 Re: [SQL] rewriting values with before trigger