| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremiah Jahn <jeremiah(at)cs(dot)earlham(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |
| Date: | 2003-04-22 17:25:57 |
| Message-ID: | 3EA57B25.70701@cvc.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
One thing to think of, is how much is your REPUTATION worth? If everything you touch, turns to gold, keeps working, raises and better equipment are a LOT easier to get. OTOH................
Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 11:47, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
>
>>>On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 10:31, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
>>>
>>>>At 08:13 AM 4/22/2003 -0500, Jeremiah Jahn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>That's the question...That 2 TB of data is nothing but documents and
>>>>>images. I'm under the perception that if that gets parked on a fibre
>>>>>channel disk array/ SAN the data will be pretty safe, and the server
>>>>>mostly replaceable at that time. Storage is my worry more than
>>>>>processing power. I don't think I'm on crack here...?
>>>>
>>>>How about backups? Backing up 2-16TB needs a bit more planning and design.
>>>
>>>The proposed solution here is to have the raid controller mirror accross
>>>the street to a similar system. At what point do off line backups become
>>>pointless?
>>
>>I've always been told to ask the question -- what's your data worth to
>>you or how much $ will you lose if you lose your data? That should answer
>>the question on offline backups.
>>
>>-philip
>
>
> It's for the court system, so not much really. It basically a convience
> only.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff MacDonald | 2003-04-22 17:26:58 | Re: Time handling in pgsql. (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-04-22 17:25:12 | Re: > 16TB worth of data question |