From: | kp <pgsql(at)pobox(dot)gr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sequence scans on indexed row |
Date: | 2003-04-20 15:17:43 |
Message-ID: | 3EA2BA17.6060106@pobox.gr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> The only way it's wrong is if the particular value being searched for is
> much less than 1/14th of the table. IIRC Postgres 7.1 does not have
> statistics about anything beyond the most common value of the column,
> and so it's easily misled by nonuniform data distributions. If that's
> your situation then an update to 7.2.* or 7.3.* seems called for.
And this is exactly the case... This is the data distribution for the
column with the 14 distinct values:
code | record_count
----------+--------------
| 186802
aa | 432
bb | 31557
cc | 5599
dd | 15511
ee | 8364
ff | 769796
gg | 328
hh | 4911
ii | 1904
jj | 9145
kk | 576944
ll | 2296
OK. I will upgrade my installation and see what happens.
Thanks very much for the advice.
Best regards...
kp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John M. Layman | 2003-04-21 05:38:11 | trouble migrating large objects from 7.1.3 to 7.3.2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-20 14:58:38 | Re: Sequence scans on indexed row |