| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sathiya psql <sathiya(dot)psql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: count * performance issue |
| Date: | 2008-03-06 12:13:57 |
| Message-ID: | 3E9C3A51-C28E-4B75-9739-E344DAC72880@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
On 6-Mar-08, at 6:58 AM, sathiya psql wrote:
> The only thing that is going to help you is really fast disks, and
> more memory, and you should consider moving to 8.3 for all the other
> performance benefits.
> Is 8.3 is a stable version or what is the latest stable version of
> postgres ??
>
Yes it is the latest stable version.
> moving my database from 7.4 to 8.3 will it do any harm ??
>
You will have to test this yourself. There may be issues
> what are all the advantages of moving from 7.4 to 8.3
>
Every version of postgresql has improved performance, and robustness;
so you will get better overall performance. However I want to caution
you this is not a panacea. It will NOT solve your seq scan problem.
> Dave
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sathiya psql | 2008-03-06 12:43:50 | Re: count * performance issue |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2008-03-06 11:50:17 | Re: count * performance issue |