| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "alex b(dot)" <mailinglists1(at)gmx(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: images in database |
| Date: | 2003-04-03 11:41:05 |
| Message-ID: | 3E8C1DD0.CFFE8D56@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"alex b." wrote:
>
> well, as many of you might have noticed, I am new to sql... :>
>
> I know of the possibility in mysql to store images or other files in the
> database.
>
> so: is there a similar thing with pgsql?
> if so, then how do you realize this?
I never get why people are so eager to use knowingly proprietary
features. Aren't all the other differences in SQL dialects enough to
make porting hard?
What about B64 encoding and storing as strings?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Howard | 2003-04-03 12:01:36 | Re: anyone know what the deal with 64.117.224.149 is? |
| Previous Message | Peter Haworth | 2003-04-03 11:36:07 | Re: this date format thing. |