Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for

From: Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Arjen van der Meijden <acm(at)tweakers(dot)net>, "'scott(dot)marlowe'" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "'Randal L(dot) Schwartz'" <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Date: 2003-03-24 20:27:21
Message-ID: 3E7F6A29.8050102@intransa.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mike Mascari wrote:

>
> Does the truth matter at all? Ugh.
>
> Mike Mascari
> mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
>
Not to diverge from the main issue, but was this a referene to a
conversation between
Bill Gate and Steve Jobs in "Silicon Valley Pirates" movie?

It is so true....unfortunately many products live by that....

Now back to PG vs MySQL.....if we put some replication or distributed
features into PG,
then MySQL will definitely look "My", as in "its mine", as in "personal
DB" like personal computers....

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Gearon 2003-03-24 20:32:53 Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2003-03-24 20:26:50 Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for