From: | Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Arjen van der Meijden <acm(at)tweakers(dot)net>, "'scott(dot)marlowe'" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "'Randal L(dot) Schwartz'" <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |
Date: | 2003-03-24 20:27:21 |
Message-ID: | 3E7F6A29.8050102@intransa.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mike Mascari wrote:
>
> Does the truth matter at all? Ugh.
>
> Mike Mascari
> mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
>
Not to diverge from the main issue, but was this a referene to a
conversation between
Bill Gate and Steve Jobs in "Silicon Valley Pirates" movie?
It is so true....unfortunately many products live by that....
Now back to PG vs MySQL.....if we put some replication or distributed
features into PG,
then MySQL will definitely look "My", as in "its mine", as in "personal
DB" like personal computers....
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-03-24 20:32:53 | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |
Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-03-24 20:26:50 | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |