From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Houssay <ghoussay(at)noos(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: configuration according to the database |
Date: | 2003-03-21 20:28:49 |
Message-ID: | 3E7B7601.1000803@cvc.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
If you are looking for speed, I would make the whole thing as arrays in memory
in C++, and just do backups to the database on a regular basis.
If you need continuous non loss of data, or true SQL compatibility and or
portablity in your application, that won't apply.
Guillaume Houssay wrote:
> I am setting up a project using APache, PHP and Postgresql.
> This application will be used by about 30 users.
>
> The database is about this type :
>
> between 12GB and 15GB
> 4 tables will have 1Million rows and 1000 columns with 90% of INT2 and
> the rest of float (20% of all the data will be 0)
> the orther tables are less than 10 000 rows
>
> Most of the queries will be SELECT being not very complicated (I think
> at this time)
>
> I have 1 question regarding the hardware configuration :
>
> DELL
> bi-processor 2.8GHz
> 4GB RAM
> 76GB HD using Raid 5
> Linux version to be defined (Redhat ?)
>
> Do you think this configuration is enough to have good performance after
> setting up properly the database ?
>
> Do you thing the big tables should be splitted in order to have less
> columns. This could mean that I would have some queries with JOIN ?
>
> Thank you for your help !
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-21 20:46:02 | Re: FW: New function - hostmask |
Previous Message | Guillaume Houssay | 2003-03-21 20:22:17 | configuration according to the database |