| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4 |
| Date: | 2003-03-12 05:29:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3E6EC5D0.9080500@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi everyone,
Thinking about the numbering further.
Would it be cool to decide on the version numbering of our next release
like this:
+ If it looks like we'll have Win32 and/or PITR recovery in time for
the next release, we call it PostgreSQL 8.0
+ If not, we call it 7.4
Win32 and PITR are great big features that will take us a long way to
the goal of Enterprise suitability. They're worth making some specific
marketing/branding efforts about and making a big fuss, that why I'd
like to see them in an 8.0 release.
Sound feasible?
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Ramsey | 2003-03-12 05:40:27 | Re: Numbering of the next release: 8.0 vs 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-03-12 05:24:58 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |