Re: Why PostgreSQL?

From: Medi Montaseri <medi(dot)montaseri(at)intransa(dot)com>
To: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>
Cc: adrapley(at)rapleyzone(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why PostgreSQL?
Date: 2003-03-05 18:47:37
Message-ID: 3E664649.3030002@intransa.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Paul Ramsey wrote:

>
>
> However, if you *really* want PgSQL to start looking attractive to
> managers and PHBs, you'll have to get a big company like IBM or HP or
> Sun to start promoting it, as IBM has done Linux. Management-level
> technology decisions are made on the basis of *references*. If
> management can reference a trusted source who promotes the product,
> they can feel safe about choosing it. That trusted source might be
> another manager in the organization, or it might be a big
> multinational IT company giving a stamp of approval.

Would the fact that RedHat has chosen PG on their distribution count ?

>
>
>> My second question is, "Why should I dedicate the time to gain
>> expertise in PostgreSQL?"
>
>
> Because it can't hurt, and because unlike Oracle it doesn't take that
> long to learn. By all means, learn Oracle too, this isn't an either/or
> proposition :)
>
> P.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-03-05 18:51:00 Re: a date_part question
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2003-03-05 18:43:21 Re: What about SELECT INTO in EXECUTE