From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | 1 to many relationships |
Date: | 2003-02-23 05:16:29 |
Message-ID: | 3E58592D.51713CB1@cvc.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
If I have a child table and a parent table like so:
---BEGIN TABLE DEFS---------------------------------------------
create table parents(
PriKey serial
);
add primary constraint to PriKey;
create table child(
parent INT4 NOT NULL
);
add foreign key constraint parent refs parent.PriKey ON DELETE CASCADE;
---BEGIN RELATIONSHIP DEF----------------------------------------
They are supposed to have the following relationship:
parent(1T1)<------->(1TM)children
textually explained as 'One parent has many children and must have at
least one in order to exist, while a child must have one and only one
parent in order to exist')
---BEGIN PROBLEM DEF / QUESTION --------=------------------------
For the 1T1 side of the relationship:
the table defs will automatically cause the children to be caught or
killed in the event that their parents disappear, no prob.
For the 1TM side of the relationship:
I don't see anything in the docs that says the PARENT will be
sacrificed if their children don't survive or disappear, and I don't
even know if there exists in any database the table definition option to
enforce this.
How is this done on different DB's? On Postgres?
---BEGIN GUESS---------------------------------------------------
Triggers?
--
Carpe Dancem ;-)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Remember your friends while they are alive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sincerely, Dennis Gearon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> | 2003-02-23 07:01:43 | Re: What filesystem? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-23 05:14:27 | Re: Strange error (Socket command option unknown) |