Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Anyway should 'set autocommit to off;commit' cause
> > a warning or an error in the first place ?
>
> IIRC, the SET does *not* start a transaction,
Yes but doesn't autocommit-off mode mean that
it implicitly begins a transaction in suitable
places ? For example, 'set autocommit to off;
declare .. cursor ..' works though it never
work without BEGIN under autocommit-on mode.
> so the COMMIT should raise
> a warning.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/