Re: Aggregate definition : small oversight ?

From: Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Aggregate definition : small oversight ?
Date: 2003-02-18 18:59:54
Message-ID: 3E5282AA.40303@bacbuc.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
>
>>Dear list,
>>7.3.x has CREATE OR REPLACE { VIEW | FUNCTION | TABLE ... }, but it lacks
>>CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE, which may be a boon to ten-thumbed users like
>>me ...
>
>
>>Is that an oversight, or is there deeper reasons to this omission ?
>
>
> Lack of implementation effort; lack of demand for feature. Is it really
> that useful, as compared to dropping and remaking the aggregate?

Avoiding errors aborting scripts. Not really a point, but ...

Emmanuel Charpentier

--
Emmanuel Charpentier

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-18 19:04:47 Re: postgres error reporting
Previous Message Felipe Schnack 2003-02-18 18:54:29 7.3.2 psql error!