From: | Christoph Haller <ch(at)rodos(dot)fzk(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Subject: | Re: IpcSemaphoreKill: ...) failed: Invalid argument |
Date: | 2003-02-17 15:36:57 |
Message-ID: | 3E510198.6B5A90FE@rodos.fzk.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> This is a fairly spectacular failure :-(. As far as I can see from
the
> semctl and shmctl man pages, the only plausible reason for EINVAL is
> that something had deleted the semaphores and shared memory out from
> under Postgres. I do not believe that Postgres itself could have done
> that --- it had to be some external agency. Unless the kernel is
> broken, whatever requested those deletions had to be running as root
or
> as postgres in order to have the necessary permissions. You sure you
> didn't have some loose-cannon script running around issuing ipcrm
> commands?
>
No, I'm not sure at all about a loose-cannon script running around
issuing ipcrm commands.
I have to ask the other staff members what scripts are running.
I already had a suspicion that something like an ipcrm command is
causing this,
but it was denied. Now, with your support they probably will believe me.
Thanks for the quick reply.
Regards, Christoph
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2003-02-17 15:43:35 | Group by count() and indexes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-17 15:21:58 | Re: IpcSemaphoreKill: ...) failed: Invalid argument |