Re: Creating index does not make any change in query plan.

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Creating index does not make any change in query plan.
Date: 2003-02-17 09:11:22
Message-ID: 3E50F492.26732.915C9CB@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 17 Feb 2003 at 14:43, Deepa wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Actually the indexed field is an bigint field. But when a query plan is
> did on a selection using indexed field as a string it actually uses the
> index. Otherwise, it does a ordinary query plan (i.e an non indexed query
> plan).
>
> >
> > What would be good in planner is to have field promotion like in C/C++,
> > smallint->bigint->float->double as and when required. That would help a hell
> > lot many people..
> >
>
> Will you please tell me how does the field promotion helps in planner.

when you say id=2, it uses default int type which is smallint, AFAIK. So
smallint != bigint and hence planner does not consider using index.

When it is a string, conversion takes place which is to bigint because of field
you are comparing against. Now bigint == bigint and hence planner uses the
index.

With field promotion, planner would convert smallint to bigint and hence will
use the index if appropriate.

Please correct me if I am wrong. This is what my impressions are from listening
to list.

HTH

Bye
Shridhar

--
QOTD: On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd say... oh, somewhere in there.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ken Guest 2003-02-17 09:12:45 Re: natural sort order
Previous Message Deepa 2003-02-17 08:45:04 Re: Creating index does not make any change in query plan.