From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Frankie Lam <frankie(at)ucr(dot)com(dot)hk> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: dblink question please |
Date: | 2003-02-13 05:22:45 |
Message-ID: | 3E4B2BA5.3020409@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Frankie Lam wrote:
> Yah!
>
> That's exactly what I did already(did this to all lines containing
> `elog(ERROR...)'. :-D
> But, I'm still experiencing some error messages when I'm doing 'extreme'
> test to
> plpgsql functions,
> for example 'ExecMakerTableFunctionResult: Invalid result from function
> returning tuple'.
>
> I really have no idea about what this message is related to the dblink
> functions. Any idea
> about it? Thanks so much.
Sounds like you didn't heed my warning. It is *probably* safe to make
the elog(ERROR...) to elog(NOTICE...) change *in that one function*,
dblink_connect(), and then use persistent connections, e.g.
select dblink_connect('dbname=blah ...');
select * from dblink('select f1 from foo') as (f1 text);
If instead you made the change within the dblink_record() function, and
you weren't careful to add additional error handling, then the message
you got is what I'd expect. You basically broke dblink for those scenarios.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frankie Lam | 2003-02-13 07:25:44 | Re: dblink question please |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-13 05:22:30 | Re: What's wrong with this identification configuration? |