| From: | James Hubbard <jhubbard(at)mcs(dot)uvawise(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Katie Ward <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curtis Faith <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Date: | 2003-01-29 17:36:36 |
| Message-ID: | 3E381124.1060302@mcs.uvawise.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>>>The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
>>>actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
>>
>>Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
>>months.
>
>
> So you've been running these unscientific tests you're telling us
> about being so successful for "some months"?
>
> Vince.
I open my mouth and insert foot: Where do I get any of these scientific
tests to determine if the latest and greatest 7.3.x will not fall down on my
favorite Unix?
James Hubbard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-29 17:46:24 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-29 17:26:52 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |