From: | "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com>, "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication on the backend |
Date: | 2005-12-07 10:46:41 |
Message-ID: | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D0C42B2@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew,
> And if postgres could actually use an infiniband fabric for
> clustering a single database instance across Opteron servers, that
> would be very impressive...
That's what we do with Bizgres MPP. We've implemented an interconnect to do the data shuffling underneath the optimizer/executor and we currently use TCP/IP, though we could haul out SDP over Infiniband should we need it.
However, our optimizer effectively minimizes traffic over the interconnect now and that works well for all of the plans we've run so far. It would be nice to characterize the improvements we could get from moving to 3x infiniband.
Regarding a direct Hypertransport to Infiniband bridge, have you looked at Pathscale? http://www.pathscale.com/ I know the fellow behind the scenes who designed it, and I think it's probably well thought out. We were gunning for less than 1us RTT through the adapter and switch once, and I bet they are close.
- Luke
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-07 12:43:41 | Re: Feature Request: Multi-octet raw |
Previous Message | J. Andrew Rogers | 2005-12-07 09:26:15 | Re: Replication on the backend |