From: | "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kjell Tore Fossbakk" <kjelltore(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig |
Date: | 2006-07-28 06:54:40 |
Message-ID: | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D03E6CA3D@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Kjell,
> I got 4 150GIG SCSI disks in a Smart Array 5i 1+0 RAID.
The Smart Array 5i is a terrible performer on Linux. I would be
surprised if you exceed the performance of a single hard drive with this
controller when doing I/O from disk. Since your database working set is
larger than memory on the machine, I would recommend you use a simple
non-RAID U320 SCSI controller, like those from LSI Logic (which HP
resells) and implement Linux software RAID. You should see a nearly 10x
increase in performance as compared to the SmartArray 5i.
If you have a good relationship with HP, please ask them for some
documentation of RAID performance on Linux with the SmartArray 5i. I
predict they will tell you what they've told me and others: "the 5i is
only useful for booting the OS". Alternately they could say: "we have
world record performance with our RAID controllers", in which case you
should ask them if that was with the 5i on Linux or whether it was the
6-series on Windows.
- Luke
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mikael Carneholm | 2006-07-28 08:46:46 | Re: Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig |
Previous Message | Kjell Tore Fossbakk | 2006-07-28 06:37:33 | Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig DDR PC3200 |