| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Csaba Nagy" <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, "PFC" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, "postgres hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Date: | 2006-06-23 09:39:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D039896E2@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Csaba,
> Regularly clustering is out of question as it would render
> the system unusable for hours. There's no "0 activity hour"
> we could use for such stuff. There's always something
> happening, only the overall load is smaller at night...
We are planning to implement a btree organized table, which keeps the
data organized by storing it with the index and using btree insertion to
store the data. This will make your design more attractive.
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | William ZHANG | 2006-06-23 10:10:11 | Re: Shared library conflicts |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-06-23 09:25:36 | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |