From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Alexander M(dot) Pravking" <fduch(at)antar(dot)bryansk(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql and readline |
Date: | 2003-01-08 17:33:12 |
Message-ID: | 3E1C1A88.25733.B5D00A8@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8 Jan 2003 at 12:28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Alexander M. Pravking" <fduch(at)antar(dot)bryansk(dot)ru> writes:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:53:51AM +0100, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday 08 January 2003 07:55, Christopher Kings-Lynne
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Is there any way of making the 'up' arrow retrieve all of the
> > >>> last multiline query, instead of just the last line? It's
> > >>> really annoying working with large multiline queries at the
> > >>> moment...
> > >>
> > >> Not that I know of, but you can use \e to edit the query in your
> > >> favourite editor.
> >
> > > Sure. But \e puts "\e" into history, instead of the query itself
> > > :(
> >
> > Hm, so it does. It seems like the edited query should go into
> > history, at least when you execute it. Peter, is this fixable?
>
> Wow, that would be a nifty trick, though they really did type \e and
> not the query the pulled in from the editor.
What about those of us who want to use \e repeatedly? Will that be
in the history buffer?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-01-08 17:54:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Have people taken a look at pgdiff yet? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-08 17:28:15 | Re: psql and readline |