Re: MOVE LAST: why?

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date: 2003-01-08 04:15:34
Message-ID: 3E1BA5E6.9463718F@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Sure. FETCH n in Postgres has always corresponded to FETCH RELATIVE n.

IIRC in SQL standard FETCH retrieves rows one by one.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-08 04:33:21 Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-08 04:07:35 Re: [GENERAL] I feel the need for speed. What am I doing wrong?

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-08 04:23:38 Re: still memory leaks with libpgtcl
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-08 04:12:31 Re: [ADMIN] pgdb.py is still wrong in Postgres 7.3.1 rpm