| From: | Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomisław Kityński <tki(at)11interactive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: xactisolevel --- ehh? |
| Date: | 2003-01-03 18:43:59 |
| Message-ID: | 3E15D9EF.60905@xythos.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
You aren't running the 7.3 driver.
In the 7.2 driver the code issues the command:
show xactisolevel
In the 7.3 driver it uses:
show transaction isolation level
The old form (xactisolevel) was removed in 7.3 of the server. However
both 7.2 and 7.3 support the newer form thus a 7.3 driver works fine
against a 7.2 database.
thanks,
--Barry
Tomisław Kityński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just switched from 7.2 to 7.3 and I get this exception:
>
> java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: Option 'xactisolevel' is not recognized
>
> at org.postgresql.core.QueryExecutor.execute(QueryExecutor.java:94)
> at org.postgresql.Connection.ExecSQL(Connection.java:398)
> at org.postgresql.Connection.ExecSQL(Connection.java:381)
> at org.postgresql.Connection.getTransactionIsolation(Connection.java:921)
> at pl.e11.dbo.Storable.create(Storable.java:1119)
> ...
>
> As you can see in stack trace, the exception is being thrown while getting
> transaction isolation level; the line 1119 is:
>
> int ti = cn.getTransactionIsolation();
>
> Of course it worked earlier, troubleless. I don't know if this is 7.3
> related problem (by 7.3 i mean both psql and jdbc drivers); i don't actually
> know what xactisolevel is --- does anyone has any suggestion about how to
> solve this? Thank you very much in advance 8)
>
> Tomek.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Charles H. Woloszynski | 2003-01-03 19:07:42 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.3 Prepared statements |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2003-01-03 18:33:03 | Re: _aclitem and aclitem in JDBC driver? |