From: | mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)tr(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker |
Date: | 2003-01-01 23:41:29 |
Message-ID: | 3E137CA9.7030309@mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>mlw wrote:
>
>
>>>The comments at the top suggest sniffing a Postgres session startup
>>>exchange in order to see the MD5 value that the user presents; which the
>>>attacker would then give to this program. (Forget it if the session is
>>>Unix-local rather than TCP, or if it's SSL-encrypted...)
>>>
>>>This is certainly a theoretically possible attack against someone who
>>>has no clue about security, but I don't put any stock in it as a
>>>practical attack. For starters, if you are talking to your database
>>>across a network that is open to hostile sniffers, you should definitely
>>>be using SSL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This is absolutely correct, shouldn't this be in the FAQ?
>>
>>
>
>Well, this is a pretty rare issue, so it doesn't seem like an FAQ.
>People need to understand the ramifications of the various pg_hba.conf
>settings, and I think our documentation does that.
>
>
A good DBA will probably read the docs, a bad DBA will probably not, and
it is the bad DBA that needs to be guided the most.
Maybe not FAQ, but is the a short page of "dos and don'ts?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-01 23:44:58 | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-01 23:09:35 | Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker |