Re: [Fwd: SETOF input parameters (was Re: [HACKERS] proposal:

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>The problem with the Berkley approach is what to do if there are two SRFs in
>>the target list.
>
> Agreed. The Berkeley code (or more accurately, the descendant code
> that's in our source tree) generates the cross product of the rows
> output by the SRFs, but I've never understood why that should be a good
> approach to take. I could live with just rejecting multiple SRFs in the
> same targetlist --- at least till someone comes up with a convincing
> semantics for such a thing.
>

I would like to start spending some time digging in to this. Any pointers or
thoughts on the best way to implement it? A little direction might save me
days of wheel spinning :-).

Thanks,

Joe