| From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com, patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, jrnield(at)usol(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.4 items |
| Date: | 2002-12-13 12:55:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3DF9D8BD.2050200@mascari.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I wanted to outline some of the big items we are looking at for 7.4:
>
> Win32 Port:
>
> Katie Ward and Jan are working on contributing their Win32
> port for 7.4. They plan to have a patch available by the end of
> December.
>
> Point-In-Time Recovery (PITR)
>
> J. R. Nield did a PITR patch late in 7.3 development, and Patrick
> MacDonald from Red Hat is working on merging it into CVS and
> adding any missing pieces. Patrick, do you have an ETA on that?
>
> Replication
>
> I have talked to Darren Johnson and I believe 7.4 is the time to
> merge the Postgres-R source tree into our main CVS. Most of the
> replication code will be in its own directory, with only minor
> changes to our existing tree. They have single-master
> replication working now, so we may have that feature in some
> capacity for 7.4. I know others are working on replication
> solutions. This is probably the time to decide for certain if
> this is the direction we want to go for replication. Most who
> have have studied Postgres-R feel it is the most promising
> multi-master replication solution for reliably networked hosts.
>
> Comments?
What about distributed TX support:
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | darren | 2002-12-13 14:13:26 | Re: Big 7.4 items |
| Previous Message | Steve King | 2002-12-13 11:56:51 | Re: FW: Duplicate oids! |