From: | pginfo <pginfo(at)t1(dot)unisoftbg(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg 7.3 memory error |
Date: | 2002-12-09 15:55:24 |
Message-ID: | 3DF4BCEC.F5AC666@t1.unisoftbg.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
it is possible to be glibc problem.
Witch version of glibc will be good ( or to upgrade to RH 8.0) ?
Exists any one using pg 7.3 on RH 7.3/8.0 ?
Bay the way pg 7.3 is very good as performance !
regards,
ivan.
Tom Lane wrote:
> pginfo <pginfo(at)t1(dot)unisoftbg(dot)com> writes:
> >> Hm. Another theory that would fit those facts is that you're getting
> >> bitten by the bug in strcoll() that used to exist in glibc. I think you
> >> said you are using Red Hat somethingorother --- are you up2date on glibc
> >> fixes?
>
> > Actualy no.But I am using this version of redhat (7.3) without any problems
> > with pg 7.2.3.
> > And it is working very well.
>
> But 7.2.3 does not depend on strcoll() in the default configuration.
> 7.3 does (unless you were careful to initdb in locale "C").
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Luc Lachance | 2002-12-09 16:36:46 | Re: UPDATE syntax problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-09 15:39:24 | Re: pg 7.3 memory error |