Re: Running under Cygwin: stability - performance?

George Weaver wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am relatively new to PostrgeSQL. I'm considering using it to
> support a distributed application that potentially could be used on a
> Windows 9x system. What is meant by the terms "stable" and
> "unstable"? If PostgreSQL is not stable enough on 9x systems for
> production, would I be advised to explore other options for database
> support??

Understand, when we say stable, we mean relaible, dependable, and
doesn't need to be rebooted for months or years. Windows, any version
thus far, does not meet the minimum requirement of "stable," Windows 9x
less so.

That being said, if Windows 98 is stable enough for your application, I
would not say that PostgreSQL is any less stable than your environment.

>
> Thanks,
> George
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Henshall, Stuart - Design & Print
> <mailto:SHenshall(at)westcountry-design-print(dot)co(dot)uk>
> To: 'Michael Weaver' <mailto:mweaver(at)corpusglobe(dot)com> ;
> 'pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> <mailto:%27pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org%27>
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] Running under Cygwin: stability - performance?
>
> Michael Weaver wrote:
> > Can anyone provide me with info on the performace and stability of
> > PostgreSQL runnning under Cygwin? MIKE WEAVER
> > Software Developer
> >
> > 5, 42 Ladner Street
> > O'Connor, WA, 6163
> > All correspondence:
> > PO Box Y3502
> > East St Georges Terrace
> > Perth WA 6832
> >
> > P: (+618) 9331 2700
> > F: (+618) 9331 3733
> > M: 0419 299 170
> > W: http://www.corpusglobe.com/
> > E: mweaver(at)corpusglobe(dot)com <mailto:mweaver(at)corpusglobe(dot)com>
> > This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
> > named above and may contain information that is confidential. If
> you
> > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> > dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
> > prohibited. When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice
> > contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions
> > expressed in the governing Corpus Globe client engagement
> letter. If
> > you have received this Email in error, please notify us immediately
> > by return email or telephone +61 8 9331 2700 and destroy the
> original
> > message. Thank You.
>
> Its been performing fine for me since pg7.1. The most major
> performance issue that I am aware of is that new conections are
> slow as for fork everything has to be copied. Also there is a
> limit of ~60 connections. This is assuming NT, under 9x its too
> unstable for production.
>
> hth,
> - Stuart
>